Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Polaroid SS4000 vs. Micotek 4000T?

To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Polaroid SS4000 vs. Micotek 4000T?
From: TonySleep@halftone.co.uk (Tony Sleep)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 07:45 +0000 (GMT)
In-reply-to: <200101232100.WAA11150@lisa.iti.cs.tu-bs.de>
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk

On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 22:00:19 +0100 (MET)  JЭrgen Koslowski 
(koslowj@iti.cs.tu-bs.de) wrote:

> 
> If archives of the list are available, I'd be happy to search there,
> if this has been beaten to death already.

http://phi.res.cse.dmu.ac.uk/Filmscan/ - but yes, they are the same guts in 
different boxes, though with probable firmware differences.

Regards 

Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & 
comparisons

Prev by Date: Re: filmscanners: new Canon printers (was SS4000 and LS-2000 real value?)
Next by Date: Re: filmscanners: new Canon printers (was SS4000 and LS-2000 real value?)
Previous by thread: Re: filmscanners: new Canon printers (was SS4000 and LS-2000 real value?)
Next by thread: RE: filmscanners: Polaroid SS4000 vs. Micotek 4000T?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread