ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Response from Nikon USA on jaggies



On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 14:02:10 +1000  Rob Geraghty (harper@wordweb.com) wrote:

> Can we (the members of the filmscanners list) petition them to fix
> the problem?  They seem to be claiming it is a hardware fault and
> it clearly isn't

Nikon are clearly playing ostrich here. They must have sent out thousands of 
these mails. The discussion forum at www.nikontechusa.com used to elicit the 
same invariant response from Nikon. They shut it down eventually.

To judge from the identical dismissive response to complaints re other kit, 
especially the bulk feeders for the LS1000 and LS2000 which have been the 
target of years of fury, it's a corporate take-the-money-and-run policy. 
They similarly dragged their feet over Nikonscan's earlier broken colour 
management. It's unwise, given the efficiency of the internet in communicating 
and collating customer grievances: we aren't just isolated little punters at 
the end of the food chain anymore. 

You'd think fixing the fault would be cheaper and create more confidence and 
goodwill than keeping schtum and throwing money at marketing instead. However, 
on the evidence, that's historically the way Nikon do things. It seems dumb to 
me: buying one of the forthcoming new Nikons will be a gamble, if there are any 
problems it seems likely you'll be on your own.

Regards 

Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & 
comparisons




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.