ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: metamerism and Epson 2000P



I said specifically that what makes two objects metameric is that under one
illumination their tristimulus values are the same and other another they
are different.

Frank Paris
marshalt@spiritone.com
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Eli Bowen
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 12:54 AM
> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: metamerism and Epson 2000P
>
>
> I think the definition you are quoting is just incomplete, and confusing
> as a result.
> All it talks about is the fact that some object "look" the same under
> some conditions (even though their spectral response is different). The
> corollary (which is not included in the section you quote) is that under
> *other* conditions, the two objects will *not* look the same.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.