ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: real value?



Wouldn't it make sense, if going away for an extended period, to remove the 
cartridge? Or am I missing something here?

At 09:54 PM 01/30/2001 -0600, you wrote:
> >(1)  Will the 1200, using non-OEM inks, clog up if it's used for periods
> >separated by months?
>
> >(2) Will the 1200 clog up, using Epson inks, if only used periodically as
> >above?
>
>In an attempt to respond to the above question, I think that most inkjets,
>including the 1200, if left for any extended period of time could clog up
>with either OEM or third party inks.  With non-OEM inks, there is always the
>distinct possibility of clogging due to other factors such as air bubbles or
>impurities.  Clogging due to extended periods of inactivity ( especially
>with respect to third party inks) can be minimized by flushing the ink out
>of the printer.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Hart or Mary Jo
>Corbett
>Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 3:58 AM
>To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>Subject: Re: filmscanners: real value?
>
>
>Michael:
>
>Thanks for your excellent advice (and the opportunity to post this message).
>
>..SNIP....





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.