ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Future of Photography (was filmscanners: real value?)



On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Arthur Entlich wrote:

> I know that professional Video CCD cameras use (or at least did... I'm 
> somewhat out of touch today) separate chips for each of the two or three 
> colors (RGB) with some type of beam slipper (some used two and used 
> subtractive math to "figure out" the third, I believe).  That allowed 
> for smaller chips, since each was only responsible for one color, and 
> then they were superimposed upon each other, like color separations. 
> Would this not work for digital stills, or is the resolution so high 
> they couldn't get registration?

I think you are absolutely correct about the video cameras, and for
the rest: sure, just see Hasselblad DFinity at
http://www.hasselblad.se/press/detail.cgi?new/969464191.txt

Best regards,
        Hugo.

************************************************************
**   Hugo Gävert                                          **
**   hugo@cc.hut.fi             http://www.hut.fi/~hugo   **
************************************************************




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.