RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

["Laurie Solomon" <laurie@advancenet.net>]

Sorry to hear that you broke your delete finger; hope it gets better soon.
:-)

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Michael Moore
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 6:35 PM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: paperless office


I realize we all get a little OT at times, but this thing has gone on for
DAYS
...


"Hornford, Dave" wrote:

> True electronic signature systems include three components -
> non-repudiation, authentication, and no-change.
> Like a pen signature, an electronic signature has to change the document
not
> sit beside the document.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laurie Solomon [mailto:laurie@advancenet.net]
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 10:59 AM
> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office
>
> >Eventually, through the use of bio-metrics, your electronic "signature"
> >will be as "good" and as unique as your fingerprint.
>
> What you say may be true enough; but even that only guarentees the
> authenticity of the signature and not the content of the document that the
> signiture has been affixed to.  Hence the problem of counterfeiting still
is
> not solved when it comes to the authenticity of documents.