ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: This Gamma Thing...?



Hello all 
I have been lurking for a while now but be very interested in the
technical aspects of scanning. With the help of on of the URLs given I
found this article <http://www.w3.org/TR/PNG-GammaAppendix.html> which
is written in a way where even I understand it (which means everyone
else will too)
Greetings
Theo from downunder

shAf wrote:
> 
> Tom writes ...
> 
> > ...
> > It's something with the way monitors show images, but what exactly
> is it??
> > I notice that my scanner software has a gamma adjustment and playing
> with
> > it I noticed that it changes the way the image appear on the screen.
> 
>     More than monitors, most devices have a specific gamma associated
> with them ... scanners, printers, digital cameras.
> 
> > But what exactly is this mysterious gamma thing?
> 
>     Each device has an associated "black" and "white", both of which
> are generally similar across all devices (forget for now the color of
> white, eg warm vs cold).  Between black and white however, is how a
> device responds to the data (eg, monitor), or its stimulation by light
> (eg, camera+film).  This response is generally refered to as the
> device's "gamma".
>     This type of response is complex, but can be simplified and
> modeled by a mathematical power function ... the gammas we all refer
> to as (eg) 1.8, or 2.2, even 1.4 are exponents of this power function
> called gamma.
> 
> > My scanner software defaults to gamma=1.4. It this an optimal value?
> If
> > not, what is a better value?
> 
>     It may indeed be your scanner's optimal value ... like I said,
> each device has its own.  However, don't let the math intimidate you.
> The important parameters to first understand are "black" and "white"
> ... if everything inbetween looks good, then your gamma is probably ok
> too.  To get it perfect ...
> 
> further reading:
> Charles Poynton's color and gamma FAQ:
> http://www.inforamp.net/~poynton/
> 
> If you use Photoshop:
> "Basic Color Theory for the Desktop"
> http://www.adobe.com/support/techguides/color/colortheory/main.html
> 
> nighttime reading:
> Bruce Fraser's "Real World Photoshop"
> 
> shAf  :o)




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.