ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Re: looking at the Sun



At 21:16 03-02-01 -0800, you wrote:
>I'm sure others will chime in on this one, but I can't let that advice go 
>unanswered. Just because the image in an SLR viewfinder is replected up 
>through a pentaprism and a ground glass screen is no reason for 
>complaisance about looking at the sun with such a camera. The efforts to 
>make the screen view as bright as possible makes the light level in the 
>eyepiece just about as dangerous as looking at the sun directly. True, 
>there is some reduction, but in many cases, if not most, it is still 
>bright enough to blind in a short time. Don't do it!
>Of course, a sunset may have the light attenuated enough by the atmosphere 
>to make it safe. But, if it is uncomfortable to look with the unaided eye, 
>don't gamble on looking through the viewfinder of an SLR.


Thanks Herschfor supporting my views on this -There are enough warning 
given out at Eclipse times for folks to realise the dangers of looking at 
the sun -we all know how it hurts just glancing at the sun with the naked eye
stuart




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.