ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems



Austin writes ...

> ...
> 
> How are you going to see ANYTHING on a crappy web image 
> at 72DPI?  I do not believe that would be useful at all.

        The JPEG may load with a res setting = 72ppi, but 
the bitmap of pixels will be the same as if the res had 
be defined at 300ppi.  Julie only needs to "re-define" 
the resolution (or image dimensions) without "re-sampling" 
the bitmap.

shAf  :o)




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.