> > How are you going to see ANYTHING on a crappy web image
> > at 72DPI? I do not believe that would be useful at all.
> The JPEG may load with a res setting = 72ppi, but
> the bitmap of pixels will be the same as if the res had
> be defined at 300ppi. Julie only needs to "re-define"
> the resolution (or image dimensions) without "re-sampling"
> the bitmap.
I don't believe anyone is going to take a 50M image file and post it to the web
for us to see, that is just silly. The only way to make a 50M image reasonably
viewable (say 800x600 @ 100DPI) on the web is to resample it. That renders it
pretty much useless for any type of detailed image comparison, which was my
point.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Mail2Web - Check your email from the web at
.
