Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Future of Photography (was filmscanners: real value?)

To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Subject: RE: Future of Photography (was filmscanners: real value?)
From: "Austin Franklin" <austin@darkroom.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:19:32 -0500
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <memo.20010206131143.52985E@tsphoto.cix.co.uk>
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk


> > What does the phrase "Plus X does not reveal grain" mean?
>
> Not alegbra;) Plus-X is a Kodak ISO125 B&W film.

And...exposed, and developed correctly, scanning it at 5080 or less will not
show grain...

I prefer D-76 1:1.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Future of Photography (was filmscanners: real value?)
  - From: derek_c@cix.co.uk (Derek Clarke)

References:
- RE: Future of Photography (was filmscanners: real value?)
  - From: TonySleep@halftone.co.uk (Tony Sleep)

Prev by Date: RE: filmscanners: Re: looking at the Sun
Next by Date: Re: Future of Photography (was filmscanners: real value?)
Previous by thread: RE: Future of Photography (was filmscanners: real value?)
Next by thread: RE: Future of Photography (was filmscanners: real value?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread