ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Canon FS2710 - any good?



On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Arthur Entlich wrote:

> If you don't require SCSI interfacing and have a USB port, you may wish 
> to consider the Minolta Dimage Dual Scan II.  Most people are quite 
> impressed with it, especially when used with VueScan, a third party 
> product selling for $40 US., and the price is lower than the Canon.
> 
> The Canon is considered a reasonable produce by those who use it, but 
> the Minolta seems to be better value.
> 
> I haven't used either scanner, and going on reports I have read over 
> numerous months through many sources.

Does either the Minolta or the Canon scanner have an IR channel for ICE?
-Paul Patton
> 
> Art
> 
> tflash wrote:
> 
> > Looking at low cost film scanners and this Canon FS2710 seems like it might
> > be nice. Anybody have strong feelings for or against it? I know there have
> > been new 4000ppi scanners announced, but will there be anything better in
> > the Canon's price range out soon?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Todd
> 
> 




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.