On Thu, 08 Feb 2001 01:31:12 -0500 tflash (tflash@earthlink.net) wrote:
> (NIKON
> COOLSCAN 4500AF)?
Widely regarded as a bit of an old dog - quality standard is not exactly bad,
but not what you would perhaps expect at that sort of price level. It's
something like 6/7 years old now, which in scanner terms is Jurassic. I'd
expect it to be completely outperformed in most or all respects by some newer
and much cheaper flatbeds with tranny hoods.
Regards
Tony Sleep
- Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info &
comparisons
