ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Canon vs. Nikon Dynamic Range



The 4.2 value is typically related to the ability of the internal components
and has little relevance to the systems as a whole. In my view entirely
useless.
David

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Arthur Entlich [mailto:artistic@ampsc.com] 
Sent:   Tuesday, February 13, 2001 1:37 AM
To:     filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject:        Re: filmscanners: Canon vs. Nikon Dynamic Range

Almost definitely not, unfortunately....

Also unfortunately, we'll never know... from either company, at least.

I hope someone get hold of both and can do a real reading...

Phil, where are you?

Art

Ray Amos wrote:

> The new Canon FS4000US has a dynamic range of 3.4.  The Nikon 4000 ED
> has a dynamic range of 4.2.  Wonder if they measure the same way?
> 
> Ray Amos




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.