ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Dust removal cloths



Thanks for the plug, Mark, and also for the advice. I'll be on the lookout.
Hersch

At 04:50 PM 02/17/2001 +1000, you wrote:
>The ones I use are dry - I don't trust *anything* wet/oily on my film (not
>even the old 'nose-oil' method..!)
>
>By the way, Hersch's suggestion was a good one - try them on your
>sunglasses first - that way you'll soon see if they have oil in them!
>
>There are a number of brands on the market, some are designed to go on
>strange-looking floor sweepers.  I have bought several types and found most
>contained a light oil, so I used them on my furniture..  But there are a
>few brands that have no oils - these seem to work very well.  They are VERY
>antistatic, are softer than any cloth, and run rings around any dust
>brushes I have tried (which I reckon put as much dust *on* as they remove).
>
>Naturally film damage *will* result from anything other than a very soft
>wipe, but after a bit of practice I now feel very confident with my light
>stroking method!  So experiment first and don't blame me later ;-)
>
>
>At 02:18 PM 16/02/01 -0600, you wrote:
> >Hi, Mark!!!
> >
> >Are these wipes wet or dry?  I'd like to try your method, as I don't have
> >ICE, and spend 'WAY too much time despotting my pictures!!!
> >
> >Thanx!!!
> >
> >Guy Clark
>
>
>==========================================
>Mark Thomas   markthom@camtech.net.au
>PO Box 1813 Pt Lincoln SA Australia 5606
>Phn (08) 8685 2116  Mob 0428 82 6960
>Int +618 8685 2116
>http://www.adelaide.net.au/~markthom





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.