Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: GEM, ROC compared to Vuescan
"Jack Phipps" <JPhipps@asf.com> wrote:
> When you do a scan using the Nikon interface do you have the "CleanImage"
> (Nikon's old name for Digital ICE) in the "Mode: On (Sharpen)" or "Mode:
On
> (Normal)"? The mode Nikon calls "Mode: On (Normal)" actually blurs the
image
> slightly. You should run in "Mode: On (Sharpen)". This should solve your
> problem with the sharpness.
Er, pardon me if I'm stating the obvious, but doesn't that just mean that
the software
is compensating for the loss of sharpness it's generating? If ICE doesn't
affect image
sharpness, why would "sharpen" be necessary?
Rob
PS Jack, I wish I could use ICE, because I can actually live with the slight
loss of
sharpness. But I *can't* use ICE because Nikon refuse to fix the jaggies
problem
in Nikonscan. It makes Nikonscan and ICE worthless on the LS30. I know
that
isn't your problem, but it's a shame not to be able to use ASF's product.
Thank
God for Vuescan is all I can say.
|
