ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filmscanners: VueScan: Fails on LinoScan/UMax flatbed?



I get only severely degraded scans on my LinoScan1400 when using VueScan
with any settings permutation.  The root symptom seems to be the raw 16-bit
scan file, which always approaches near-black:  mean ~4, std dev ~2 in
histogram.  Both internal VueScan and external PS processing of the scan
yield image histograms posterized moderately in 16-bit and radically in
subsequent 8-bit mode conversion.  Films being used are 4x5 negs, bw and
color.

In other software/hardware combinations I can produce the smooth-as-butter
losslessly-editable 16-bit files I want.    From 35mm film the
SS4000/VueScan team produces histograms so undulating and and full-bodied I
lust to osculate the monitor.  LinoColor software renders a similarly fine
file with the LinoScan flatbed from 4x5 color negs (though not as yet from
bw negs.)

Inasmuch as my ultimate goal is often greyscale prints from 4x5 negs I¹d
dearly desire VueScan to work with the LinoScan.

Is my experience characteristic of the VueScan/Linoscan[UMax] combination or
somhow idiot-syncratic?
Can anyone suggest a settings combination that works?

Mike Rich  




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.