Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
filmscanners: Vuescan vs Silverfast control
- To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
- Subject: filmscanners: Vuescan vs Silverfast control
- From: "Joel Nisson" <jdn@bird9.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 12:41:58 -0500
- List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
- Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
- References: <14769D969B50054BAF73264420F2E7413968@bofs.aussy.ingr.com> <002601c0796e$dea28450$0a0dcf84@zorglub> <000f01c0798a$fcf164a0$b301000a@mis> <002c01c079c4$99303c40$053e9bca@indosat.net.id> <003101c079e2$b78e4ce0$960e0a41@grlnd1.tx.home.com> <004501c07a16$d181fc80$903c883e@AlanTyson>
I'm trying to decide between Vuescan and Silverfast for use with my SS4000
scanner (Already own Silverfast, testing trial VS). My main question at
this point is whether there is a fundamental difference in how the two
programs control the scanner that allows one or the other to create better
scans, ie, exposure time control or source light intensity. I realize that
Silverfast has many more controlable variables, but I've heard that the VS
control system is deceptively simple and that the software is actually able
to get better scans somehow by the way it controls the scanner.
Thanks.
Joel Nisson
jdn@bird9.com
|
