Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: Vuescan - A few technical questions
On the Nikon LS-30 the LEP is one pass at normal speed and a second at
slower-than normal. The multi-pass BTW is actual multiple passes (I found
no misregistration of the passes) unlike for the LS-2000.
Maris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Nisson" <jdn@bird9.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 12:15 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan - A few technical questions
| I assumed that LEP is one pass at a slower-than-normal speed. If so, it
| shouldnl't be subject to mis-registration that MP can cause on some
scanners
| (SS4000).
|
| --Joel Nisson
|
|
| ----- Original Message -----
| From: "shAf" <michael@shaffer.net>
| . After I saw the mis-registration for LEP, I scanned again at 16x MP
| only.
| >I couldn't see where LEP improved over
| > 16x MP. After all (Ed may comment), what's the difference between
| > increasing the exposure time and scanning mutiple times?? I can
| > understand how exposing for shadows improves film response, ... but
| > digitally, we are only making numbers larger or averaging smaller
| > numbers ... both would seem to produce the same effect for dense areas
| > of film(?)
| >
| > shAf :o)
| >
|
|
