Re: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like W98SE?

["IronWorks" <ironworks@ameritech.net>]

Is a PC100 chip sufficient for Win2K?  Microsoft's site recommends the PC133
minimum.

Another possibility for some might be a dual boot system with 98SE and also
2K.

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)" <caryenochr@enochsvision.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 1:11 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like
W98SE?


| > [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of ALLM Rose
| >
| > I am considering whether to reload Win98SE, WinMe or Win2000
Professional on
| > my Athlon 700 (256MB SDRAM) system.  I am currently using Win98SE, Adobe
| > Photoshop 6.0, printing with an Epson 870 through WiziWYG color
profiles,
| > and scanning images through my Nikon LS-30 with Vuescan.
| >
| > Does anyone see any potential conflict that would make Win2000 a bad
choice?
|
| Win2K is faster and much more reliable than Win9x. No contest at all. I
use Win2K with a
| Polaroid SS35+ scanner, Epson 3000 printer, DV capture board, Wacom Intuos
tablet,
| Vuescan, AdobePS 6, etc. Everything works smoothly. But before making a
decision it's a
| good idea to check hardware and system compatibility:
| http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/upgrade/
|
| Cary Enoch Reinstein aka Enoch's Vision, Inc., Peach County, Georgia
| http://www.enochsvision.com; http://www.bahaivision.com -- "Behind all
these
| manifestations is the one radiance, which shines through all things. The
function of art
| is to reveal this radiance through the created object." ~Joseph Campbell
|