ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filmscanners: Win2K system requirements



        I would not run Win2K with a 100 MHz CPU if that is what Ironworks
was asking. If it worked at all it would be horribly slow. Microsoft
recommends a minimum of 133 MHz CPU.

        As for bus speed, I am not aware of any minimum, but if there is a
minimum, I'm sure it is less than 133 MHz.

        This is all that is posted on the Win2K System Requirements page
(for the Professional version)(
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/guide/professional/sysreq/default.asp
):  

"133 MHz or higher Pentium-compatible CPU. 
64 megabytes (MB) of RAM recommended minimum; more memory generally improves
responsiveness. 
2GB hard disk with a minimum of 650MB of free space. 
Windows 2000 Professional supports single and dual CPU systems."   


        If you want to know if a particular computer is Win2K compliant, you
can try this page:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/upgrade/compat/search/computers.asp


Eli

-----Original Message-----
From: Arthur Entlich [mailto:artistic@ampsc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 4:11 PM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like
W98SE?




IronWorks wrote:

> Is a PC100 chip sufficient for Win2K?  Microsoft's site recommends the
PC133
> minimum.
> 
> Another possibility for some might be a dual boot system with 98SE and
also
> 2K.
> 
> Maris
> 

Does Win 2K require a 133mHz motherboard bus?  Can WIN 2K run on a 
Celeron system CPU which uses a 66mHz bus?

Art




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.