I would not run Win2K with a 100 MHz CPU if that is what Ironworks
was asking. If it worked at all it would be horribly slow. Microsoft
recommends a minimum of 133 MHz CPU.
As for bus speed, I am not aware of any minimum, but if there is a
minimum, I'm sure it is less than 133 MHz.
This is all that is posted on the Win2K System Requirements page
(for the Professional version)(
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/guide/professional/sysreq/default.asp
):
"133 MHz or higher Pentium-compatible CPU.
64 megabytes (MB) of RAM recommended minimum; more memory generally improves
responsiveness.
2GB hard disk with a minimum of 650MB of free space.
Windows 2000 Professional supports single and dual CPU systems."
If you want to know if a particular computer is Win2K compliant, you
can try this page:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/upgrade/compat/search/computers.asp
Eli
-----Original Message-----
From: Arthur Entlich [mailto:artistic@ampsc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 4:11 PM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like
W98SE?
IronWorks wrote:
> Is a PC100 chip sufficient for Win2K? Microsoft's site recommends the
PC133
> minimum.
>
> Another possibility for some might be a dual boot system with 98SE and
also
> 2K.
>
> Maris
>
Does Win 2K require a 133mHz motherboard bus? Can WIN 2K run on a
Celeron system CPU which uses a 66mHz bus?
Art