ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution



Try Matrox's latest, the 450, for $150. It has two video outputs build in.
One you can run one at 1600x1200, the other up to 2048x1536. Takes only one
slot.

Frank Paris
marshalt@spiritone.com
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Eli Bowen
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 7:33 PM
> To: 'filmscanners@halftone.co.uk'
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
>
>
>       I use twin 21" monitors at work under Win2K. Once you have tried
> twin monitors you will be spoiled forever.
>       It is not necessary to have two identical video cards, but some
> cards are not compatible with others. Try before you buy, or get a return
> guarantee. Matrox cards have had more than average compatibility
> problems in
> my experience.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.