ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Kodak RFS 3600



I have put roughly 500 negs through mine, most in rolls of 36.  It will not
choke on the 37th, you just have to start over: pre-scan the frame (if you
want), and then scan away.  At full resolution, it takes about 75 minutes to
do a roll on a home built AMD K6II 450 Mhz with 384 megs.  I use the USB
connection.  After the prescan and any adjustments, which take about 10-15
minutes, I have to do no babysitting.

I would suggest, however, that the scanner sit up fairly high off the
ground.  The roll just hangs out of the machine.

Spencer Stone

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of tom
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 11:25 AM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Kodak RFS 3600


Thanks for the review.

Have you (or anyone else) batch scanned anything yet? I'm wondering how
long it takes to chew through a roll, whether the 37th frame will make
it choke, and how much babysitting you need to do.

Thanks.

tv

(Hi Jules.)

David Sirola wrote:
>
> Here's my take on the Kodak 3600, which I recently purchased.
>
> All in all, it produces fabulous images, which is the most important
issue.
>
> Slides look fantastic, and C41 scans are amazing: enough to make




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.