ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: OT: Co-processors & Amiga



> Austin Franklin wrote:
>
>  >> Most people who never used one are confused completely about what
>  >> Amiga was.
>  >> No, it wasn't a grown-up Atari,
>  >
>  >
>  > Hardware/architecture wise it sure was.  The Atari was the first such
>  > machine to have custom processors (four) designed specifically
> to handle
>  > video and audio processing, as well as I/O.  It was truly
> revolutionary at
>  > the time.  I agree the intended use was entirely different,
> but that does
>  > not change the architecture.
>  >
>
> Actually, you are both right, and wrong.

OK, Arthur, nothing you said contradicted anything in my statement, so I
don't get where I was "wrong".




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.