RE: filmscanners: RE: Win2k and application RAM

[Ramesh Kumar_C <RKumar_C@zaplet.com>]

I think one year back Microsoft stopped support to Alpha. 
There is no Win2000 on Alpha.


Bye
Ramesh

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Edmonds [mailto:mmje@mmje.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 12:13 PM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: RE: Win2k and application RAM


I can confirm the 2GB split between OS and App RAM. It is something to
do with the Alpha port of NT I think and to keep things consistent for
the coders, Microsoft translated the Alpha restriction to the Pentium
version. I believe W2K has the same problem but I don't think there is
an Alpha port of W2K - can this be confirmed?

Mark

In message <EJEKINMEKEDPJJMHLODJCEFACIAA.marshalt@spiritone.com>, Frank
Paris <marshalt@spiritone.com> writes
>Well, that's not how it does its memory management.
>
>Frank Paris
>marshalt@spiritone.com
>http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>> [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 2:40 PM
>> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>> Subject: RE: filmscanners: RE: Win2k and application RAM
>> 
>> 
>> AFAIK the maximum addressable space is 4GB regardless of
>> the combination of RAM/Virtual.  I seriously doubt
>> that the OS would eat anything like 1 or 2 GB since
>> Win2K runs happily in 128MB, so that would leave most
>> of the 4GB available to applications.  
>
>> Rob