ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like W98SE?



I would like to know this myself. I know it was true for early versions of
Windows 98. Is it still true for SE and ME? Or is this just an urban legend?

Frank Paris
marshalt@spiritone.com
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Bob Shomler
> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 7:45 AM
> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like
> W98SE?
>
>
> >2) It will use as much RAM as you can pack on a board. Windows 98 and ME
> >can't really use more RAM than about 256M effectively, but W2K
> can go all
> >the way :-)
>
> Can you elaborate on win98's inability to use larger RAM (or
> refer me to some discussion on this)?
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Bob Shomler
> http://www.shomler.com/gallery.htm




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.