ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Derek Clarke
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 8:51 AM
> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
>
>
> An inappropriate choice of control is just as much a bug as writing it
> incorrectly yourself!

The choice of tool windows is not an inappropriate choice. They are using
them for the exact purpose Microsoft intended them.

> You can't really argue that Adobe didn't have the opportunity to test
> their work, considering the length of time that elapses between versions.

I am far from arguing that. Just the opposite. Obviously, Adobe would
consider the fixed pixel dimensions of their tool windows a design decision
and they had to carefully program it to make it work. It's just that it is a
design decision that will become increasingly less effective as the
resolution of monitors continues to increase. I suspect that the base class
for their tool windows will become even more complex as they try to adjust
for different classes of users, judging from their screen resolution and
selected font size.

Frank Paris
marshalt@spiritone.com
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.