ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Graphics Cards



Both the G450 and the dual-head GeForce cards use a slower less-capable 
DAC for the second port, so it can't manage quite the same resolution / 
refresh rate combination.

If you want the truly ultimate multi-monitor system you have to find an 
adaptor available as AGP _and_ PCI and use two or more of them.

cmaddock@clear.net.nz (Colin Maddock) wrote:

> Larry,
>          Thanks for the reply about the GeForce2 MX graphics card. Hope 
> it wasn't too hard tearing yourself away from the new computer to make 
> it ;-).
> 
> There's no doubt that the Matrox G450 is a good card, Tom's Hardware 
> site particularly mentions the "excellent 2D performance and razor 
> sharp signal quality". It would be hard to go past that, but the 
> GeForce MX looks to have a spec. that should be fine for PS work, as 
> far as I can see, and they are available on the local market at a 
> reasonable price. All the discussion on the List of late has got me 
> thinking that maybe the setup of monitor and card here could benefit 
> from an upgrade.
> 
> Some of the GeForce MX cards can drive two monitors I see. Are there 
> restrictions on the way these cards can do this compared with the G450, 
> do you know?
> 
> Colin Maddock
> 
> 
> 




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.