Re: filmscanners: Independent Resolution on Dual Monitor Win2K

["Maris V. Lidaka, Sr." <mlidaka@ameritech.net>]

Whatever.  I'm going with the ATI Radeon VE.

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Frank Paris" <marshalt@spiritone.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 10:19 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Independent Resolution on Dual Monitor Win2K


|
|
| > -----Original Message-----
| > From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
| > [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Larry Berman
| > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 7:29 PM
| > To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
| > Subject: filmscanners: Independent Resolution on Dual Monitor Win2K
| >
| >
| > Hi Frank,
| >
| > They've only got independent resolution working with the latest Matrox
| > drivers. I posted about it the other day. I'm currently running
| > my 21 inch
| > monitor at 1152x864 and an old 13 inch monitor (until my new 19 inch
| > arrives) at 800x600 on my new Win2K system. Here's a link to the
| > page with
| > the latest Matrox drivers:
| > http://www.matrox.com/mga/support/drivers/latest/home.cfm
| >
| > The drivers were released about a week after the review was
| > written. That's
| > why the conclusion is incorrect.
| >
| > Larry
|
| I also made a couple posts about the new drivers. You probably missed
them.
| In any case, the review was wrong in claiming that the problem was with
W2K.
| The problem was with the drivers.
|
| Frank Paris
| marshalt@spiritone.com
| http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
|