The copyright that Jay Maisel requested was in his cover letter.
We've all seen copyright stated in various ways. Sometimes with two years,
the year of origin and year of publication. Sometimes just the year of
publication. If you've seen older single year copyright, it has probably
been that the images was published in that year. On the web it might mean
that the site hasn't been updated.
Is there any exact specification for copyright presentation?
Larry
>Berry wrote: "If Jay Maisel has not shot film, except for one roll, during
>the past year,
>how is it that all of the images are copyright 2001, yet most are from film?
>
>I guess the copyright does not correspond to the date the image was shot?"
>
>I noticed that too. The copyright definitely does not correspond. Some of
>those images are 15+ years old.
>
>Cathy
<:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:>
Larry Berman
Web Sites for Artists: http://BermanGraphics.com
Compare Image Compression from the top
Graphics Programs: http://ImageCompress.com
Explore the Art Show Jury process from a web site:
http://ArtShowJury.com
<:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:>