Berry wrote:
>
> If Jay Maisel has not shot film, except for one roll, during the past
year,
how is it that all of the images are copyright 2001, yet most are from film?
> I guess the copyright does not correspond to the date the image was shot?
In the United States, at least, the copyright corresponds to the date of
publication--although the work does have a de facto implication of copyright
protection when it comes out of the camera (there are probably court cases
on this, but that's not my field).
Best regards--LRA
-----------------------------------------------
FREE! The World's Best Email Address @email.com
Reserve your name now at
