ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Changing the subject line: was : Jay Maisel Interview with Pictures and Link



I agree. I'm not especially interested in reading about the intricacies of
copyrights right now (perhaps later and with a sense of urgency), but I
would like to read more comments about Jay Maisel.

Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Eli Bowen <elbow@microsoft.com>
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Date: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 2:36 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Changing the subject line: was : Jay Maisel Interview
with Pictures and Link


>Yes, please change the subject line when you change the subject.
>The "was:abc xyz" could help.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Lynn Allen [mailto:lalle@email.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 9:26 AM
>To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>Subject: Re: filmscanners: Jay Maisel Interview with Pictures and
>Link...
>
>This msg brings up a point I've wanted to address, but haven't.
>Please note the Subject. Then note the response, and the question it
>answered.
>do others think it would be
>helpful to change the Subject line when responding to a thread that's
>gotten
>a bit off-track?
>
>Like "copyrights," the msg doesn't have a lot to do with "Jay Maisel."
>It's
>just a thought, on my part--I'm too new at this business to offer any
>definite solutions, and I certainly don't mean to criticize. I happen to
>*like* the interplay that goes on here on the List, and find it
>rewarding,
>informative, and useful (else I wouldn't be here). But possibly adding a
>new
>Subject, with the "was:abc xyz" extension would help people who are
>trying
>to clear their mail quickly. Do you think?
>
>Or am I out in left-field again.
>
>Best regards--LRA
>
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.