ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: OT more copyright questions



On 21/3/01 9:35 pm, "Laurie Solomon" <laurie@advancenet.net> wrote:

> Of course, it all depends on a number of factors.  The only universal
> statment that one can make as an absolute is that you do not have the right
> to "sell images of ANYTHING you photograph."  If the sculptures are on
> private property or are private property, you need the permission of the
> owner to photograph them even if they can be seen from a public vantage
> point if they are recognizable,the center of interest of the photograph, or
> of significant importance to the image and its meaning and worth.
> 
> This has more to do with model/property releases than with copyrights, with
> property rights and trespass laws than fair usage issues, and invasion of
> privacy than infringements of copyright.  If it is a public sculpture on
> public property ( like in a municipal museum or gallery, you would need to
> get permission from the municipality or the public facility where it is
> located.  The only time where you do not have to workry about acquiring any
> permission is if the sculpture is in the public domain and located on public
> property.
Laurie

The sculptures were commissioned by the County Library and are located
around the town, some on the roadside and others in public parks.

Richard




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.