ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Grain in Color negative Film



At 06:54 22/03/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>That's what I thought as well.... and the minilab I used is one that (to the
>naked eye) runs a clean process... however, what I noticed was that the grain
>pattern in large areas of uniform density was much tighter and smoother in the
>film from the custom lab...
>
>Mike M.

there is no explanation to that. all c41 processes are equivalent, the main 
difference is that profi labs have smaller variation of brands, speed, etc, 
which translates into less variation of iodide/bromide content of 
in-service developer. that effect was detected for the first time with an 
introduction of Fuji 400 negs. They required different replenishment rate. 
it is my speculation, cos I honestly do not believe, there is any 
difference. If someone has an example, please post. Grain pattern is 
dependant of the film structure, not developer.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.