ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Grain removal and aliasing



This is certainly an understandable answer, if not a solution, since I'm
"locked in" to the 2700ppi format for awhile.

If I may be so naive to ask: What is a "pel size?" I get the idea that
"sympathetic vibration" is in play here.

Best regards--LRA


------Original Message------
From: TonySleep@halftone.co.uk (Tony Sleep)
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Sent: March 23, 2001 4:02:00 AM GMT
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Grain removal and aliasing


On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:24:56 +1030  Mark Thomas (markthom@camtech.net.au)
wrote:

>  It may be a pipe-dream, but I figure that as *I* can easily
> recognise and describe the difference between grain-aliasing and real
image
> information, there should be a way for a programming technique or plug-in
> to do likewise.

You'll find it easier to (a)change the film, or (b)get a higher resolution
scanner. Grain aliasing seems to be a particular problem of ~2700ppi
scanners,
because of the proximity of pel size to grain size. I've never seen much of
it
at all from the Polaroid 4000. It will be interesting to see if the new
LS4000
also escapes the problem. It should, but maybe LED lightsource and possibly
sharper optics may cancel some of the advantage.

Regards

Tony Sleep


-----------------------------------------------
FREE! The World's Best Email Address @email.com
Reserve your name now at http://www.email.com





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.