ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long)





Laurie Solomon wrote:


> 
> Hence, given the purpose that you would be using the inkjet print for,
> archival quality is not a major significant factor as long as the damn thing
> does not turn orange within a month or two; moreover, since there are few
> other features other than a whiter base that you could obtain from using
> Premium Glossy Photo Paper over the Epson Photo Paper when used with the
> 1200, I do not think the Premium Glossy Photo Paper (EPGPP) would be of any
> benefit to you.
> 
One potential negative in this equation, at least in earlier 
manifestations of this paper, I found that the surface would "fracture" 
if the paper was flexed in a tight circular curve, looking a bit like 
the "crazing" or cracking of the glaze of an old teacup. (Something you 
Brits can certainly relate to.) ;-)

Art




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.