ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long)



I guess it would depend on the drum scanner as to how tight an arch it would
be rolled into, which may depend on the size of the drum on the drum
scanner.  However, from what I had heard about the problem, the fracturing
was usually never that visible to the naked eye unless you pacifistically
looked for it and when the print was already arched and never bad enough
that bits of the print flaked off due to the fracturing.

Tony look at it this way, if the repro house does tightly arch the print
causing it to flack apart, you could sue them for damaging the print. :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Tony Sleep
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 7:23 AM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long)


On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:46:41 -0600  Laurie Solomon (laurie@advancenet.net)
wrote:

> nor do I think the print will be handled that roughly
> in terms of being flexed into a tight enough arch to cause the
"fracturing"
> or rectilineation that you are speaking about.

They will be rolling it up to go into a drum scanner. OTOH if bits flake
off,
that would be a plus - sabotage and revenge combined:).

Regards

Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info
&
comparisons




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.