ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Scanning dpi and epson papers was Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (l



Hi all:  I have found that I get a better transition from scan to PS to print
using Vuescan, PS and Hammermill Jet Print Ultra Glossy and Epson's Matte
papers.  Hammermill's glossy is a bit heavier than Epsons.  I do not know if 
this
applies to those out of the US.

Gordon

Michael Moore wrote:

> Kodak makes an excellent photo weight glossy paper that works just fine in my
> Epson 740....
>
> Mike M.
>
> Derek Clarke wrote:
>
> > In fairness to Epson, the full technical specs of all their papers is
> > available on their various national web sites.
> >
> > But to be honest, I don't think they make a paper you would describe as
> > photo weight. Epson printers have relatively straight-through paper paths,
> > but they still have a limit on the weight of paper they can reliably feed,
> > even one sheet at a time.
> >
> > If you really want something chunky and weighty, why not get into mounting
> > or even laminating?
> >




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.