ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Scanning dpi and epson papers was Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing



Lynn wrote:
>For people merely documenting a roll of film or a box of slides (which
>presupposes not being *super-critical* of the output other than that the
>black/white points are fairly stable), using a lower scan resolution (1350
>to 300, in reverse order) is much faster.

Especially with APS - my recent experience with APS and bulk scanning almost
convinced me to make my next compact camera an APS one.  Being able to put
the film in the scanner and press a button before walking away to leave
the scanner to scan the entire film is just wonderful.  Oh how I wish I
could do this with my 35mm films!

Rob


Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
http://wordweb.com






 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.