>Conclusion:
>This must means? that we photographers are "over do it " when we are
>delivering pictures in big tif or psd files.
Yes, it is simply excess of PASSION ! ;-)
Sincerely.
Ezio
www.lucenti.com e-photography site
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lynn Allen" <lalle@email.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 4:08 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: File format
> Mikael wrote:
>
> >I think there are some myths about jpg. tif. psd. and high quality
printing
> pictures.
> We (printing company, myself and a medical company picture bank)
> have done tests about saving pictures that later can used to print out on
> high glossy paper.
> All files are scanned in 350 ppi
> We compared a tif file and a jpg file in level 7 ( Photoshop 5.0)
> Proof printing 2 picture.
> No one could se any difference in the 2 pictures in colors. A closer look
> with magnifier glasses shows some differences in a small text.
> We took the same jpg file and resaving it up to 5 times. We looked at each
> step and where suppriced of the small changes of colors in the picture.
> Example:
> A well known medical newspaper printed on high glossy paper wants their
> pictures files in Jpg level 5 .!!!!!!They must also have done some test
> there jpg.5 level seems to suite there needs.
>
> Conclusion:
> This must means? that we photographers are "over do it " when we are
> delivering pictures in big tif or psd files.
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> This is something I've suspected for some time now (about the
> compressions--I *knew it* about the photographers! ;-) ).
>
> Thanks for the post, Mikael!
>
> Best regards--LRA
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------
> FREE! The World's Best Email Address @email.com
> Reserve your name now at
>
>
