Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: JPEG Loss - File format

To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: RE: filmscanners: JPEG Loss - File format
From: Larry Berman <larry@bermanart.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 19:00:00 -0500
In-reply-to: <383781559.985987213451.JavaMail.root@web444-ec.mail.com>
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk

I was the first to answer this question and now I question myself for 
letting this go on this long.

Everyone that saves their scans as a JPEG raise your hand.

Case closed.

Larry



> >>So the image DOES degrade with each iteration, whether or not it is
>changed.


***********************************
Larry Berman

http://BermanGraphics.com
http://IRDreams.com
http://ImageCompress.com

***********************************

Follow-Ups:
- RE: filmscanners: OT now? - JPEG Loss - File format
  - From: "Mark T." <markthom@camtech.net.au>

References:
- RE: filmscanners: JPEG Loss - File format
  - From: Lynn Allen <lalle@email.com>

Prev by Date: RE: filmscanners: JPEG Loss - File format
Next by Date: Re: filmscanners: Re: shAF: OT - Dicky returns to form..
Previous by thread: RE: filmscanners: JPEG Loss - File format
Next by thread: RE: filmscanners: OT now? - JPEG Loss - File format
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread