Frank,
IMHO printers is not OT, but your question, which is what I and others
answered, was particularly "Why is it that we hardly hear anything of *this*
amazing printer . . ." [emphasis supplied]
I think we fairly answered your question and did not claim it to be OT. We
appreciate the quality of the printer and many of us wish we had one, but if
there is nothing to post on it then there is no post on it.
Maris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Frank Paris" <marshalt@spiritone.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 10:29 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Photoprinters is not off topic
| No, that obviously has nothing to do with it, because this list produces
| hundreds of posts about other Epson printers which is actually not
| surprising at all since hearing about good photo printers is of interest
to
| just about anyone doing filmscanning.
|
| Frank Paris
| marshalt@spiritone.com
|
|
| > -----Original Message-----
| > From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
| > [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Maris V. Lidaka,
| > Sr.
| > Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 6:06 AM
| > To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
| > Subject: Re: filmscanners: Printdpi
| >
| >
| > Probably because this is a filmscanners list, I would think.
| >
| > Maris
| >
| > ----- Original Message -----
| > From: "Frank Paris" <marshalt@spiritone.com>
| > To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
| > Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 12:38 AM
| > Subject: RE: filmscanners: Printdpi
| >
| >
| > | I have been through so many cartridges on my Epson 2000P that I've
lost
| > | count. The images have been rock solid and consistent from the day I
| > bought
| > | it to the present. I calibrated it once soon after I got it and that
has
| > | been that. Why is it that we hardly hear anything of this
| > amazing printer
| > on
|
