Berry,
Sorry for the delay - my browser wasn't functioning right.
It's at page and the previous page.
His online article only discusses printers with resolution up to 600dpi,
though, so the article is just the basics.
Maris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Berry Ives" <yvesberia@earthlink.net>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 7:56 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Printdpi
| on 3/29/01 7:58 AM, Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. at mlidaka@ameritech.net wrote:
|
| > The general consensus is printing in the range of 240-360dpi, and it
will
| > depend on the paper - for a good explanation of why see
| >
| >
| > The best thing to do is to experiment on *your* printer and find the
optimal
| > dpi for each type of paper you generally use. I did that for my HP
| > PhotoSmart just the other day on HP glossy, and found that 240dpi
appeared
| > the best.
| >
| > Maris
| >
| > ----- Original Message -----
| > From: "Richard Starr" <Richard.Starr@valley.net>
| > To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
| > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 7:27 AM
| > Subject: filmscanners: Printdpi
| >
| >
| > | The dpi thread leads me to ask what the best dpi for printing on an
Epson
| > | printer (Stylus 600 for example) would be.
| > |
| > | My habit is to correct an image at the scanned resolution then move it
to
| > a
| > | default blank page for printing, using PhotoShop's free transformation
for
| > | sizing. I save the 'print' version as well as the full resolution
file.
| > The
| > | prints look good.
| > |
| > | I normally use a blank page set for 8.5 x11 inches and 110 dpi. I'm
| > wondering
| > | if I'd see better results at a higher dpi or faster results at a lower
| > dpi.
| > | Lower dpi would result in a smaller file for storage too. There must
be
| > an
| > | ideal maximum resolution beyond which the image doesn't print better
and a
| > | minimum resolution below which it is noticeably degraded.
| > |
| > | Comments?
| > | Rich
| >
| So where are the scantips on that page?
|
| ~Berry
|
|
