On Mon, 2 Apr 2001 07:45:35 -0700 shAf (michael@shaffer.net) wrote:
> It is most likely a simple matrix type profile as determined
> by Ed, which also takes into account selectable film type. This is
> speculation on my part, but I don't believe Ed uses a "conversion
> engine", rather a mathematical matrix transform.
This is correct, he uses a 3x3 matrix.
Regards
Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info &
comparisons