ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filmscanners: Canon Flatbed D2400UF



A few people on the list have mentioned this scanner. PCWORLD the US magazine
not the UK store has a test of it at
http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/article/0,aid,44621,00.asp

They claim that the USB interface is much slower than a SCSI or Firewire 
interface
and this causes it to get a lower score. I have seen this remark a few times
in scanner test recently. How can they say this when they obviously have not
tested the scanner with a Firewire interface. it could be the scanner that is
the bottleneck not the interface.

Or is this being picky


Eddie Cairns




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.