ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Review of the Nikon CoolScan 4000



To get to VueScan's ICE equivalent use any cleaning mode.  To get to the ICE & 
GEM
equivalent go to the medium or high cleaning modes.

Gordon

Jeremy Brookfield wrote:

> Rob Geraghty wrote:
>
> > "Jeremy Brookfield" <jeremy@percula.com> wrote:
> > > The software (Nikon Scan 3.0) is so buggy as to render the scanner useless
> > to
> > > all intents and purposes.
> >
> > Have you tried Vuescan?  Does it work?
>
> Yes, it works quickly and (so far) reliably. Howver, I have difficulties with
> the color management. Nikon Scan 3 produces well balanced colour without
> manipulation. None of Vuescans 7.0.12 color balances comes even close to being
> reasonable. I also miss Nikon Scan's curve control (I have figured out how to
> use the new LCH dialog properly). Also I cannot find Vuescan's ICE GEM option
> (is there one?) With the LS2000, I prefered  Silverfast to Nikon Scan 2.51
> because of the better colour manipulation options. To sink further down to
> Vuescan's limited controls would not be acceptable to me.
>
> Jeremy




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.