"Steve Greenbank" <steve@gccl.fsbusiness.co.uk> wrote:
> use photoshop with the digicam so now PS can do most operatioons with 48
bit
> images why should I bother to learn how to process using the scanner
> software ? (I use mostly slides - colour cast removal from negs could be
> tricky in PS).
Hm, but Vuescan would be a much cheaper way to get the source data.
> You can make a judgement but you would have to invest quite a lot of time.
> Given the asking price I think many people will give up on the grounds
that
> if costs that much it should be easy to use.
> I don't think it is.
I had a quick look at the demo and that's what I suspected.
> http://www.greenbank.themutual.net/artixscan4000.htm
The results you got from Silverfast certainly look pretty poor.
> I'm in the UK and generally we get "done over" too. Bundles are less or
> there is no cashback offer or it costs more. Frequently it's all three!
Ah, we've all got to move to the USA I guess. ;)
Rob