ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Profiling negative films



In a message dated 4/25/2001 0:08:19 AM EST, michael@shaffer.net writes:

> Which isn't to say Ed has a few issues to work out.  Ed may have more to
>  say, but I believe his evaluation of Q60 target results only in a
>  matrix-type profile, which, generally is a simplification of a device
>  profile.

As long as the sensor is linear, there's nothing that can even
theoretically be more accurate than a 3x3 matrix transform.  This
is what VueScan uses.

Only when there are nonlinearities, such as with inks on paper,
do you need more than 3x3 matrix transforms.

Regards,
Ed Hamrick




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.