ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Profiling negative films



In a message dated 4/25/2001 10:27:32 AM EST, michael@shaffer.net writes:

> > As long as the sensor is linear, there's nothing that can even
>  > theoretically be more accurate than a 3x3 matrix transform.  This
>  > is what VueScan uses.
>  > ...
>  
>   Just to clarify ... does a simple "3x3 matrix" profile allow for the
>  capture of each R,G & B channel having a different "linearity"?

I don't know what "different linearity" means.  The 3x3 matrix
transform assumes that each CCD channel's value is linearly
related to the number of photons that hits it.

Regards,
Ed Hamrick




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.