>Have found no serious problems with 30-year-old
>Ektachrome (other than its inherent contrastiness, which sometimes
>challenges the DR of my scanner), but the colors *don't* seem to be as
>bright as I remember.
But then, it could be your memory that has lost brilliance over the years.
:-) I could not resist saying that Lynm; you left too big an opening to
ignore.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Lynn Allen
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 7:30 AM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Cleaning slides
Art wrote:
> ....In fact out steadfast
Kodachrome, which has very good "dark keeping" properties, fades quite
rapidly in bright light-- I'm speaking of losses of dye density within
minutes under a projector bulb illumination.
> Ektachromes, on the other hand fare better under bright lighting, but have
poorer dark keeping properties.
Having done quite a few Kodachromes that were over 50 years old, I can
testify to Art's assessment. Have found no serious problems with 30-year-old
Ektachrome (other than its inherent contrastiness, which sometimes
challenges the DR of my scanner), but the colors *don't* seem to be as
bright as I remember.
I've also found that some dust on very old slides seems particularly
resistant to removal, as if it were fused to the slide. Frankly, as long as
I have a competent spot-retouching program I'm reluctant to clean old slides
with *anything* but a soft brush and air. But the occasional
thumbprint--more likely to be on negs than mounted slides--is enough to send
me running for help. :-)
Best regards--LRA
-----------------------------------------------
FREE! The World's Best Email Address @email.com
Reserve your name now at
